Guettarda wrote:
Actually one of the major issues in the dispute is whether BC/AD violates NPOV because it requires Wikipedia to make an assertion the Jesus is the Messiah/God. BCE/CE merely describes the condition, and thus does what the NPOV policy asks.
That's a disingenuous presentation of the problem. Can you show a single instance where your assertion that Jesus is Messiah/God is required, and that is not a part of someone's argument against BC/AD? The use of BC/AD merely requires that there may have been an historical Jesus who was born at or near a time that is reasonably consistent with the dating system. The idiotic assertion that Jesus was God is irrelevant.
Ec