The problem is that GFDL really doesn't allow that kind of content-mixing.
It's more strongly viral than CC-by-SA.
On 10/26/06, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/26/06, Guettarda <guettarda(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 10/25/06, George Herbert <george.herbert(a)gmail.com> wrote:
For CC-BY-SA, you have to both tag or list its license info and the
author
> info (BY), and whatever you're producing can't restrict further
> redistribution (if you're making a book, you can sell the book, but
you
can't
keep people from scanning or copying the images and then
redistributing them again).
Two questions:
1. Is the "no restriction on redistribution" not also true of the GFDL?
2. While you cannot restrict further redistribution of the pictures in
the
book, does the copyright status of the images
impact that overall
copyright
of the document in which they are redistributed? (I'm guessing not).
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that one can include CC-BY-SA
in
an otherwise copyrighted work, as long as you credit and don't restrict
further redistribution of the CC-BY-SA parts. The key term here is that
the
book becomes a Collective Work, with the CC-BY-SA works (images, text,
whatever) being component parts of a larger whole.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.5/legalcode
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l