On 10/25/06, Chris Picone ccool2ax@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, so if I print out a set of articles, I just add to each image (or in the back somewhere) that Image X is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, right? got it.
On 10/24/06, Oskar Sigvardsson oskarsigvardsson@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/25/06, Chris Picone ccool2ax@gmail.com wrote:
Well, if I'm printing Wikipedia, I have to print it under the GFDL, right? So I can't use the image. Besides, couldn't some crazy lawyer in the future consider the article used by an image "derivative work"?
There is no problem in printing a page with bout CC-BY-SA and GFDL on it. Aslong as you follow both licenses when you redistibute it. The images and text just have different licenses, that's all. If you follow them, you'll be fine.
And no, when you include a picture of an image in an article, you are not making a derivative work of it. You are redistributing it. That's it.
--Oskar _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
For CC-BY-SA, you have to both tag or list its license info and the author info (BY), and whatever you're producing can't restrict further redistribution (if you're making a book, you can sell the book, but you can't keep people from scanning or copying the images and then redistributing them again).