Anthony wrote:
On 10/19/06, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/19/06, Rob gamaliel8@gmail.com wrote: In this case the article consisted of nothing more than naming the person and where she works and a unsourced rumor about her having an abortion.
I'm disappointed to have read this entire thread before getting this bit of information.
...
Absolutely. If you're going to revert a blanking, you should be damn sure that at least *some* part of the original text was in fact accurate.
Don't know whether the reverter was "damn sure", but some part of the original text _was_ in fact accurate. The unsourced rumor was in the second half of the article, the first half of the article was pretty much okay.