Hi,
I'm a little surprised by this thread. Unless I am not understanding what I am reading, there seems to be actual resistance to the idea that one should read what they are reverting back to. When one reverts, one becomes the latest author/publisher of that article; I suggest that there should be some sense of responsibility for its content.
I'd just encourage all of us not to make edits that can result in introducing, or, yes, re-introducing, defamation, nonsense or vandalism into Wikipedia articles. If you really cannot afford the time to read your edit, it probably is better to not make that edit. As Greg Maxwell is pointing out, the bots do at least leave a message on the user's talk page about what to do if they believe that they have been reverted in error.
Jkelly