Hi Oldak ,
Thanks for responding.
As the article stands there are factual inaccuracies, uncited or poorly
cited statements and allegations, sarcastic wording, bias and "weazel
words".
This has been discussed at length in the discussion pages but no one who has
tried can get anywhere without being dismissed, ignored and abused. If you
like I can expand on this with links, examples and quotes.
I would just like to discuss strategy for dealing with this. I know
Wikipedia has it's own systems, which I am following, but I am also looking
for a suitable forum to just talk with other wikipedians as to where best to
channel time and energy into this.
For example, for this particular case,
Do I take one point at a time and only discuss that one point?
Do I refute every questionable point in the article all at once (a lot of
work!)?
Is it the right time to involve mediators?
If so what are the pros and cons of the official mediating team vs the
mediation cabal?
Is the editor in question's behavior so blatant I should go straight to the
arbritrators?
As part of an organisation, where is the line between raising awareness of
this issue and encouraging "meatpuppets"?
If this is the wrong forum then I am open to suggestions for a more
appropriate place to discuss this.
Thanks & regards
P.S.
What does "Ugh" and "wish I hadn't asked" mean? It sounds kind of
discouraging ;-)
Oldak Quill wrote:
On 11/10/06, bksimonb <simon(a)bkinfo.net> wrote:
I tried reasoning with the main editor but as I,
and others who have
tried,
have found that the guy acts like a tyrant and won't budge an inch. Even
to
the extent of reverting NPOV warnings.
I haven't looked at the article in question but reverting NPOV warnings
can
be justified if the article is already seemingly NPOV.
What do you suggest is wrong with the article as it stands?
--
Oldak Quill (oldakquill(a)gmail.com)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Where-to-discuss-best-approach-to-deal-with-defamitor…
Sent from the English Wikipedia mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.