On 10/7/06, daniwo59(a)aol.com <daniwo59(a)aol.com> wrote:
[...] But not everything in the
Voice (or even in the NY Times for that matter) deserves an article. Editing
isn't only about knowing what to add, but about knowing what not to add as
well.
WP:NOT censored.
It's not particularly suprising that searches through mainstream press
don't catch many sex-related brand names. Most sex-related products
don't show up in mainstream press.
Despite that, sex related topics are a major economic field, including
media, birth control and "safe sex" stuff, and other topics including
sex toys.
Pursuant to that, WP has generally tasteful and encyclopedic articles
on related topics.
Do you not believe those of us who are saying that Fleshlight is very
well known if not notorious within the field?
Do you have a reason for opposing this that is not general
uncomfortableness with having the topic in Wikipedia?
--
-george william herbert
george.herbert(a)gmail.com