On Oct 10, 2006, at 7:11 PM, Jossi Fresco wrote:
On Oct 9, 2006, at 4:06 PM, Matt Brown wrote:
I disagree. Lots of editors disagree. Because, if you look closely, the reliability of a source has more to do with who is writing it and their reputation, how well they are trusted, and the nature of the subject matter, than defining something simply by what medium it appeared in.
Sure...
Just tell me *how* can you verify *who* is the author of a USENET post.
Depends entirely on the author. Did you have one in mind?
-Phil