On 10/10/06, Andrew Gray shimgray@gmail.com wrote:
There's plenty of articles which are festering cesspits, one or two pathological editors warring over them, and no-one trying (or caring) to "make it good".
The benefit of having an article to read will always outweigh the problem of it putting a slight strain on Wikipedia. I think one can always find some willing editor to come along and fix an article (do something to it at least). It's just a matter of improving our mechanisms of sorting out POV-pushers and of article improvement.