--- Ligulem <ligulem(a)pobox.com> wrote:
What's the purpose of letting non-autoconfirmed
accounts
edit
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Semi-protection_policy?
(other than causing work for others to revert the 97%
crap and making
noise on watchlists)
Why can't we simply semi-protect that? (Or do we need yet
Anons should not be editing policy. As you point out, it
contributes little (nothing that couldn't be done with a
throw-away account) and just wastes admin time. And may
even lead to the frustration that has been voiced on this
list by admins quitting wiki. Utterly pointless.
~~Pro-Lick
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/User:Halliburton_Shill
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pro-Lick
http://www.wikiality.com/User:Pro-Lick (now a Wikia supported site)
--spam may follow--
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com