On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 14:44 +0100, geni wrote:
On 10/3/06, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
{{not verified}} if it's under a few days old, {{unreferenced}} if it's over.
Problem is that people would rather ah read about dancing pigs. Well that an the issue that the various cleanup lists are insanely backloged.
I think we need to remember that these notices actually serve two functions:
1. They act as a reminder, via cleanup lists etc., to improve the quality of the article.
2. They act as a service to the reader, in effect acting as a disclaimer. In a sense, this actually helps our credibility, because letting readers know what *isn't* trustworthy helps them to identify what *is*.
Jake