On 10/3/06, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 03/10/06, Jake Waskett <jake(a)waskett.org> wrote:
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 15:23 +0100, David Gerard
wrote:
> The bot would have to be semi-auto, i.e. a
human would have to look
> over the result.
What makes you say that?
(a) people will be happier if there's a human pressing the button (b)
in a crappily-formatted article, the source info may be easy for a
human to spot but hard for a robot. I just changed [[Riptides]] to
take the {{unreferenced}} off it since the ref was given as plain text
as the last paragraph. (I put that in a more standard format as well.)
While I agree there should probably someone reviewing the changes, a
"patrol" would probably pop up whose sole reason for existence is to try to
put sources on everything _or_ (and this is what I fear might be more
likely) to speedy half the articles out of existence.
Carl