Removing it is good with the reasons you gave. We don't need lists of in-jokes. There's still quite a few on [[4chan]], but luckily we've directed a lot of traffic to external sites that, er, specialize in that.
Ryan
On 11/29/06, niht-hræfn nihthraefn@gmail.com wrote:
On Nov 29, 2006, at 18:48, Anthony wrote:
<snip /> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncyclopedia#Main_Page_holidays is most > likely not covered by any reliable third party sources at all, let > alone ones off the Internet. That section I'd advocate dropping <snip /> > Anthony
That section was removed (as superfluous and "not verifiable") when I rewrote the article, although regretfully because the information isn't kept in any one place elsewhere. It is however easily verified by checking http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php? title=Main_Page&action=history (a perfectly valid source and 100% accurate, a higher accuracy rate than any (most) third party), but that'd never fly with the RS whores (please excuse my French). Anyhow, it's been readded, and I'd predict future attempts to remove it will be similarly reverted and I personally don't think the drama is worth it.
--Keitei _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l