On Tue, Nov 28, 2006, Tony Jacobs wrote:
Well, most of them weren't independent sources, being links to gnaa.us and gnaauk.co.uk.
Of those that were independent, they fell into three classes: some made only a passing mention of GNAA, some were articles where GNAA was only mentioned in the message board responses at the bottom, and those that were actually *about* GNAA were blogs (there were one or two of those).
This is not true and makes me wonder how many people making those claims really have read the article.