Example Two: Same Old Stuff
Ellen Schrecker article now reads,
"John Earl Haynes charged that "Schrecker… devotes hundreds of pages to demonizing opposition to communism in any form." Schrecker argues that her position is that "in this country[,] McCarthyism did more damage to the constitution than the American Communist party ever did."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellen_W._Schrecker
Hence Wikipedia is used as a soapbox to defame Prof. John Earl Haynes of the Library of Congress as an appologist for McCarthyism by equating McCarthyism with "opposition to communism in any form". This method of allowing "criticsim of critics" for NOPV was raised at Talk:Chip Berlet while the page was protected from editing an unsubstaniated defamatory charge against Mr. Laird Wilcox as "an unethical reporter". I asked,
"...is this the normal format in Wiki articles were "Criticism" subhead have been created for NPOV, where than the critics are then smeared..."
A neutral editor proposed "criticism of the criticism...should be pruned out."
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Chip_Berlet&diff=prev&...
I of course was charged with personal attacks and this group of editors continues to push POV under license as a result of the evidence now admitted to have been errantlly disallowed in my case.
Nobs01