jf_wikipedia@mac.com wrote:
On May 30, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Raphael Wegmann wrote:
The article is called "Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy" and should report about the *controversy* surrounding the cartoons. How are we supposed to write a neutral report on this controversy, if we block the editors who feel insulted by the cartoons?
Raphael,
The blocks may not have been against the editor(s) who felt insulted, but against the editors that disrupted the editing process by editwarring, violating the 3RR rule, etc. Was not this the case?
Take a look yourself:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/148.81.117.224 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/68.173.27.37 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/62.135.119.144
A single contribution can't be much of editwarring, can it? At least you definitely can't violate the 3RR by it.