On 5/28/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/28/06, Tony Sidaway f.crdfa@gmail.com wrote:
Well it is relevant if he blocks someone who is editing a pokemon article that he is also editing. And if you don't know what he edits, there is also the question of his motivation. Far better that editors can plainly see that the administrator who blocked them was not involved in a content dispute on the article.
Is that not problem not solved by a cut down "checkadmin" that tells you whether an admin has been involved in a given article?
Steve
Not really. It just so happens that our admin who works on pokemon articles has never edited [[Raticate]]. in any case it would be fairly trivial to use brute force searching to figure out who was doing what.