On 5/28/06, Steve Bennett <stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/28/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Well it is relevant if he blocks someone who is
editing a pokemon
article that he is also editing. And if you don't know what he edits,
there is also the question of his motivation. Far better that editors
can plainly see that the administrator who blocked them was not
involved in a content dispute on the article.
Is that not problem not solved by a cut down "checkadmin" that tells
you whether an admin has been involved in a given article?
Steve
Not really. It just so happens that our admin who works on pokemon
articles has never edited [[Raticate]]. in any case it would be fairly
trivial to use brute force searching to figure out who was doing what.
--
geni