On 5/19/06, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Saladin1970's actual article "contributions" have all been POV,
usually not relevant to the article, extremely poorly written,
generally unsourced, and, when sourced, taken from non-reliable
sources; that's when they haven't been POV copyvios. Moreover, they
have been reverted by 9 different editors. He has managed all of this
in under 50 edits. I'm having difficulty understanding what value he
could possibly bring to the project.
Jay.
He's a newbie. He doesn't understand our rules or procedures or have any
sense of institutional memory like those of us who have been around for a
long time. Revert him, zap him with the cluebat a few times, and give him a
chance to reform. This is a wiki and the article histories are preserved
indefinitely. If short blocks have no effect on him, then I'd be willing to
consent to a community ban. But we have to try them first.
Ryan