Steve Bennett wrote:
On 5/17/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG
<guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
In the case of living individuals? You want to
pay for the lawsuits?
I can't see any problem at all with requiring all critical information
on living individuals to be robustly sourced before insertion. Where's
the downside? That we fail to repeat speculation on blogs and attack
sites? Seems to me that would improve credibility, not reduce it.
Living individuals aside.
Right, although there are other categories where this can be important:
1. Existing companies and other organizations (an extension of the
living persons, since these are groups of living persons)
2. Information which might have some significant safety implications