Steve Bennett wrote:
On 5/17/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
In the case of living individuals? You want to pay for the lawsuits? I can't see any problem at all with requiring all critical information on living individuals to be robustly sourced before insertion. Where's the downside? That we fail to repeat speculation on blogs and attack sites? Seems to me that would improve credibility, not reduce it.
Living individuals aside.
Right, although there are other categories where this can be important:
1. Existing companies and other organizations (an extension of the living persons, since these are groups of living persons)
2. Information which might have some significant safety implications