I'm saying that taking archeological primary sources on some skeleton to an artist's impression of the person is more difficult than taking several drawings to some composite artist's impression.
The latter is more like what we do everyday on Wikipedia: we take multiple sources to generate a composite representation of the information out there. We don't do OR interpreting original data ourselves.
Laura Scudder
On 5/18/06, Steve Bennett stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/18/06, Laura Scudder laurascudder@gmail.com wrote:
I think that the only people qualified to carefully interpret archeological evidence and render it into an artists' impression would be those who do it professionally (it's not as simple as interpreting other's drawings).
So who is qualified to write an encyclopaedia? :)
Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l