On May 17, 2006, at 12:23 PM, Oskar Sigvardsson wrote:
Can anyone explain to me why those pages arn't not
just huge WP:POINT
violations? They serve no other point than to make the point that
wikipedia is not censored, and they are disruptive in doing it. Thus
"disrupting wikipedia to prove a point". These pages should be nuked
on sight.
Try reading WP:POINT again. I think "don't disrupt Wikipedia to make
a point" is a misleading title anyway—the better title is "State your
point; don't prove it experimentally".
--
Philip L. Welch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch