On 5/14/06, Prasad J prasad59@gmail.com wrote:
Britain did not "like" Germany but as I explained war was inevitable.
Doubtful. Hitlers racial ideas included britian as part of the master race.
It was only a question of which country made the first move-this country would also perhaps have the advantage of being the first to act. This much was obvious from Hitler's actions. And I urge you to re-read your history book, Germany declared war on France in 1939 itself.
If His Majesty's Government has not received satisfactory assurances of the cessation of all aggressive action against Poland, and the withdrawal of German troops from that country, by 11 o'clock British Summer Time, from that time a state of war will exist between Great Britain and Germany.
That was how britian declaired war. France did something simular.
And if Britain really wanted to help countries threatend by the Nazis, why didn't the U.K intervene when Hitler attacked Austria, or for that matter when Mussolini invaded Abyssinia?
Britian didn't have much of a militry capacity when hitler occupied Austria. Like most of the world at that time they were not too bothered about the rights of africans. In any case this is beside the point
As for the "logical fallacies" you foynd when I highlighted the atrocities committed by the U.K in India to advance the Crown's agendas there, I will not honour your "objection" with a reply.
So you conceed you are comitting logical fallacies?
Although no U.S laws may be broken as a result of this act there are international laws in place to regulate internet-related issues.
Name one. There are very few international laws and most of them are to do with war.
PS-What does skin colour have to do with it? As a side-note (unrelated to this discussion) can you name one (active) Arb Com member who is South Asian-as in of Indo-Aryan descent?
No. Last I cheacked it was not considered likely that humans evolved there.
Or an Arbitrator who is Muslim?
No idea. Neither do I care. The religion of arbcom members is a matter of supream indifference to me.
No offence but I am pretty sure there are South-Asian and Muslim editors out there. Only none of them will be voted into ArbCom.
How do you know? Generaly any long term admin who hasn't caused much in the way of trouble has a reasonable chance of being elected. I didn't run across any questions relating to religion at the last arbcom election.