Britain did not "like" Germany but as I explained war was inevitable. It was only a question of which country made the first move-this country would also perhaps have the advantage of being the first to act. This much was obvious from Hitler's actions. And I urge you to re-read your history book, Germany declared war on France in 1939 itself. And if Britain really wanted to help countries threatend by the Nazis, why didn't the U.K intervene when Hitler attacked Austria, or for that matter when Mussolini invaded Abyssinia? Britain had many colonies in Africa, they could have helped the Abyssinians if they wanted to. Answer these two questions. Secondly as I stated the Battle of Vienna does not count as an example since at that time diplomacy (in it's present form) was not existent. As for the "logical fallacies" you foynd when I highlighted the atrocities committed by the U.K in India to advance the Crown's agendas there, I will not honour your "objection" with a reply. Although no U.S laws may be broken as a result of this act there are international laws in place to regulate internet-related issues.
PS-What does skin colour have to do with it? As a side-note (unrelated to this discussion) can you name one (active) Arb Com member who is South Asian-as in of Indo-Aryan descent?Or an Arbitrator who is Muslim?No offence but I am pretty sure there are South-Asian and Muslim editors out there. Only none of them will be voted into ArbCom. This is not to say the present Arbitrators are not fair-I've interacted with one of them so I know they are. Just making an interesting observation.