-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Timwi wrote:
Uhm... I'm completely flattered. WTH is the
reasoning behind CSD T1? How
did that ever pass community concensus? I can't believe more than a
handful of people would agree to that! What on Earth is supposed to be
harmful about users proclaiming their view on religious or controversial
topics?
I don't get this.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a battleground for social, moral, or
religious issues. Userbox templates and user templates group
Wikipedians into competing factions. This infrastructure has been used
in the past to abuse our decision-making policies by vote-stacking.
If you really feel it is necessary to proclaim your religion on your
userpage, you can do it, but you don't need a template to do so.
- --
Ben McIlwain ("Cyde Weys")
~ Sub veste quisque nudus est ~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
iD8DBQFEZNolvCEYTv+mBWcRAuQRAJwI4bK2ePyoXaLSJ5IgvGEGM7g8KACfauGU
40bI2f9bm+pDRRgswmEenN0=
=f46Z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----