On 5/12/06, Steve Block steve.block@myrealbox.com wrote:
If they are and they aren't citing authors, aren't they in breach of the GFDL. And if that's the case, can we sue? Please?
The Wikimedia Foundation doesn't hold the copyrights over Wikimedia content, it is merely a user that must follow the terms of the GFDL like any mirror or fork. Wikimedia could, however, provide financial or legal assistance to the authors whose copyright is infringed in a lawsuit.
While the use of censorship as a competitive advantage is morally reprehensible, Baidu is still a fairly large publicly traded company and not just some random .cn spam site. If they're in violation of the GFDL, communicating with them is probably going to be more effective than suing them. I suspect that the copyleft part is what they'll mainly have problems with.
I would be interested in an actual report about the content, policies and practices of this fork. In fact, I think it might be a good idea for Wikimedia US or one of its chapters to pay for such a report. Otherwise we'll be basing much of our arguments about the project on hearsay.
Erik