Hi Mark, But then again different people find different things inflammatory. If I were to add a userbox saying "This user supports the publication of Prophet Muhammad" cartoons", mainly (perhaps only) Muslims are likely to find that inflammatory. Again if I added a userbox proclaiming that "This user supports Iran's nuclear programme", then Americans are likely to find it offensive. Therefore the issue of what constitutes inflammatory userboxes becomes subjective. The majority of Wikipedians are American,therefore anti-U.S userboxes are more likely to be termed inflammatory. And this issue is not confined only to userboxes-it happens in articles too-the issue of the article "US-Israeli threats to attack Iran" is one example.The issue of whether the U.S Navy intentionally shot down an Iranian passenger jet seems to have been dismissed (despite a U.S Navy invesigating officer's observations to the contrary) by the simple,yet effective arguement -America is too noble to stoop to such a level. It happens all across the Internet actually. I spent 20 minutes trying to explain to one chatroom user why the U.S Department of Homeland Security does not have the right to arrest me (a foreign citizen) for what I say about the war in Iraq!