Ah, here we come back to our original argument. It is not possible to provide reasoning for inclusion or exclusion in this case, because the sole point here is notability. I think all MTG cards are notable, you think they are not. It is a pure-and-simple difference of perception about what Wikipedia should be. You assert the cards aren't notable, which means they should be deleted, to which I reply saying they are notable, which means they should not be deleted. No reasoning exists, no debates are possible because it's a matter of personal opinion. In this situation what avenue is left to us except counting votes to determine consensus?
Molu
On Thu, 11 May 2006 17:11:27 +1000, Mark Gallagher wrote:
G'day Molu,
Please go ahead. All the information in available on the net nicely catalogued, and even the images may qualify for fair use. A complete database of MTG cards will be a popular section in WIkipedia. If they're taken to AfD, rest assured at least I will be voting Keep.
No, you won't, because AfD is not a vote. You may be arguing in favour of keep, but rest assured that your mere presence will not be enough to have any influence --- you'll have to actually provide some semblance of reasoning.
-- Mark Gallagher "What? I can't hear you, I've got a banana on my head!"
- Danger Mouse
--------------------------------- Blab-away for as little as 1ยข/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with Voice.