On 5/6/06, Matt Brown <morven(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm. I'd doubt many people in the world believe
we've reached a
million articles without handling a lot of trivia. Do you really
think that anyone would be surprised by the fact that a good portion
of that million are on such subjects?
Well, of course, but at the same time, we're totally missing articles
on some actual genuinely interesting and notable subjects. I was
shocked to find that there are some Châteaux in the Loire Valley that
don't have an article.
I don't think we tend to boast about our numbers
of user accounts, do
we? User accounts unused for <x> months and with no undeleted
contributions should be pruned though, I think, simply from a
manageability point of view.
I seem to recall having seen a few references to our user count in
newspaper articles. Wildly differing figures of course.
I've noticed people mentioning our active user
count and our admin
count more often than the total.
Probably true. Not that our "admin count" is particularly meaningful
either, of course.
Steve