On 5/6/06, Matt Brown morven@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. I'd doubt many people in the world believe we've reached a million articles without handling a lot of trivia. Do you really think that anyone would be surprised by the fact that a good portion of that million are on such subjects?
Well, of course, but at the same time, we're totally missing articles on some actual genuinely interesting and notable subjects. I was shocked to find that there are some Châteaux in the Loire Valley that don't have an article.
I don't think we tend to boast about our numbers of user accounts, do we? User accounts unused for <x> months and with no undeleted contributions should be pruned though, I think, simply from a manageability point of view.
I seem to recall having seen a few references to our user count in newspaper articles. Wildly differing figures of course.
I've noticed people mentioning our active user count and our admin count more often than the total.
Probably true. Not that our "admin count" is particularly meaningful either, of course.
Steve