First off, I'd like to start by apologizing for my indulgence here,
and asking anyone on the list who wants serious discussion to please
pass over this email. I'm also replying to multiple Julie messages in
one email for your skipping convenience.
Julie, I'm sending this to you separately just in case you've already
unsubscribed from the list.
On May 5, 2006, at 3:45 PM, <julieharding1(a)charter.net>
<julieharding1(a)charter.net> wrote:
You guys are hilarious! Did you know that all of the
emails that
have been coming to me today, I've been editing?
Should be, "Did you know that I've been editing all of the emails
that have been coming to me today?"
All of you intelligent men spell like you're in
the third grade.
If there are other women in here, don't tolerate thier behavior!
"Their".
Putting up with boobs? Many of you men are probably
so fat from
sitting around that you have your own boobs to contend with, so
leave ours alone. And I'm here to testify that a man's crotch is a
lot like a nuclear reactor. Bump it up against anything, and it's
ready to go!
Actually, bumping a nuclear reactor doesn't really do much. Also, I
think you missed the double meaning: "boob" also means "a foolish or
stupid person".
Now calm down boys. Without titties in the world, you
wouldn't be
here.
-Julie
I don't think you need to worry about men not appreciating breasts.
On May 5, 2006, at 12:31 PM, <julieharding1(a)charter.net>
<julieharding1(a)charter.net> wrote:
Hello Steve,
I'll have to consider that now after the full head on attack I
received last night. Is this your guys' way of testing someone to
find out if they have enough proxy to be on your team of editors?
Um, I don't think that's what "proxy" means.
Because if your team of editors work together every
night accusing
each other of being on crack or being insane, then I don't want
anthing to do with it.
"Anything".
There is a whole world wide web out there that can
appreciate my
intelligence and time more than you all did last night. Yet if you
want to be my friend, and you will respect me for what I can help
you with, then tell me where to go and maybe I'll see you there in
a couple of days. God Bless
-Julie
On May 5, 2006, at 8:39 PM, <julieharding1(a)charter.net>
<julieharding1(a)charter.net> wrote:
I just spent all day editing a whole section for you
Guy. Your
system would not save it for me. It had to have been at least six
hours. God, I'm tired. Why did I do it? My love for English and
writing and boy were there a lot of mistakes! Yet, se la vi.
"C'est la vie".
Snowspinner apologized, so I don't have to report
him for cyber-
abuse. Your cite is filled with it though. Today, I was referred
to as: "Boobs." You are going to lose a lot of very talented
people at the rate you're going.
P.S. The attachment is just a Goodbye picture of me. Maybe if you
try, you can find and save the whole section I edited today.
On May 5, 2006, at 3:56 PM, <julieharding1(a)charter.net>
<julieharding1(a)charter.net> wrote:
You are kidding aren't you? You are using Pokemon
as a metaphor
right? Please tell me that Pokemon is not a subject in Wikipedia.
No Phil, you're just being a jerk and screwing with my head again.
Knock it off. And if Pokemon really is in there, then it's your
idiocy.
-Boobs
Yeah, we do cover pop culture. Clever move signing your email
"Boobs", though.
On May 5, 2006, at 4:10 PM, <julieharding1(a)charter.net>
<julieharding1(a)charter.net> wrote:
Geni,
How can we convince Guy that it is necessary to visually recognize
the troublemakers and then block them from Wikipedia? Dispute
resolution? I'm spending two thirds of my time trying to get
troublemakers to leave me alone. Then, very rarely, a serious
posting reaches me and I can respond. This is rediculous!
"Ridiculous".
Last night I got accused of being on crack, I was
accused of being
insane, and today I was referred to as a "Boob." Yet obviously my
opinion must count for something because my e-box is full.
-Julie
--
Philip L. Welch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch