---- geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/5/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG
<guy.chapman(a)spamcop.net> wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2006 13:21:10 -0700 (PDT), you
wrote:
"Voting" has changed to
"finding consensus", but the process remains
the same. User conduct regulation is called "dispute resolution", but
focuses mainly on finding a pseudo-judicial basis to ban troublesome
editors.
You think?
Look at the RfC on Whaleto. Does that fit this description? Very
often problems are quietly resolved. Of course sometimes they aren't,
but I'd suggest that far more disputes are resolved than end up with
indef-blocks.
Guy (JzG)
Bad choice. I'd give that one a fair chance of ending up at arbcom
sooner or latter.
--
geni
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Geni,
How can we convince Guy that it is necessary to visually recognize the troublemakers and
then block them from Wikipedia? Dispute resolution? I'm spending two thirds of my
time trying to get troublemakers to leave me alone. Then, very rarely, a serious posting
reaches me and I can respond. This is rediculous! Last night I got accused of being on
crack, I was accused of being insane, and today I was referred to as a "Boob."
Yet obviously my opinion must count for something because my e-box is full.
-Julie
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l