On 5/4/06, Ben McIlwain <cydeweys(a)gmail.com> wrote:
We cannot put up with these attempts at gaming our
consensus-based
system. Consensus doesn't work when it just becomes a numbers game of
who can recruit the most votes. And trying to make a rational decision
about the merits of an article when a bunch of sheeple are coming in
mindlessly on both sides and voting without even considering the issues
is absurd. We need to deal with this problem. We need to modify our
policy so that it IS a blockable offense to vote-stack and game the system.
Way way way to subjective. RFC and arbcom would probably be a better option.
--
geni