On 3/27/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
Someone has taken to slapping {fact} and {weasel} all over the criticisms, which is understandable enough since the rebuttals all come from primary sources. Any decent suggestion on how to prune it down to an appropriate length and keep it that way would be appreciated. Guy (JzG)
Formatting. Just as I create subsections when I want other editors to expand on sections, do the opposite if you don't want that. So, trim a whole section down into a bullet point, headed with "the three most well-known claims are the following".
The 'weasel' tag is pretty silly - there's not even consensus that weasel words are particularly bad. It should be deprecated in favour of {fact} or something.
Steve