Steve Bennett wrote:
On 3/26/06, charles matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
Oh. I don't think so. That presents a challenge to posters of obscenities and unacceptable images. Since we cannot prevent such postings, it is all rather futile to make claims we are in no position to give any kind of warranty for.
Sorry, I'm not talking about shock images, but rather, porn stars, anatomy and so forth.
Oh wow. Naked bits of bodies need to be censored, eh? Perhaps we should just remove this evil "eee-vo-lushion" thing while we're at it?