In message 44242C9C.30501@telus.net, Ray Saintonge saintonge-EynCeXvFgoheoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org writes
slimvirgin-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org wrote:
Interesting ruling from the High Court in England, which could have implications for our talk pages. http://technology.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,,1737001,00.html
What makes this case less important is that the defendant failed to defend the case, and the result was in effect a default judgement.
Or else her solicitor may have advised her that there simply /was/ no defence, and to try to contest it would simply have incurred large amounts of further legal expenses which she would have to pay (remember - she would have to pay both her own legal expenses and the plaintiff's).