James D. Forrester wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
On 3/21/06, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
Initialy you could just use plain speach and rely on the issue that no one else uses them so no one is going to bother makeing a bot. More advanced aproaches could involve spoting male and female voices against background noise.
That could work, though automated (unattended) text-to-speech synthesis has not significantly improved in my lifetime. (Read: it's terrible. Yes, even IBM's whizzo-prang stuff. Horrendously disjointed and considerably more difficult to use as a "test" of something's humanity than would be desired, I feel.)
Yes, but the nice thing is that we don't really need speech synthesis for this, since recordings of spoken words are plentiful and easily available. In fact, we already have a perfect source: the Spoken Wikipedia project.
Cutting the recordings up to build a decent library of a few thousand words (with a dozen or more recordings of each) does take some work, but could be semiautomated (given that we have access to the written version) and easily done by volunteer contributors.
Background babble can be generated automatically by mixing random segments from the same recordings. Other noises can also be included: anyone with a laptop and a microphone can easily contribute practically limitless amounts of digitally recorded noise.