On 3/17/06, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
CC-BY-ND is a fairly permissive license. It's much more permissive than, for instance, the license Wikimedia provides for its own logos. By your rationale Wikimedia shouldn't be contributing to Wikipedia.
Oh come on. We all know this is a special situation. I am so *bored* with people saying, "But the Wikimedia logos are not licensed freely!" and implying that this is somehow has any implications for policy. They are the single and sole category of exception for a very straightforward and practical legal reason.
FF