Delirium wrote:
Take a look at en:Talk:Harry_Reid, for example. There was just a message by Danny that there were "some concerns", without any comment on to what they were, how they might be fixed, or really anything else besides "Harry Reid doesn't like our article".
The Harry Reid article is no longer protected, and hasn't been for some time. As has been explained repeatedly, the *length* of that protection was an error, due to Danny being out of town and us all being new to this sort of thing.
In my opinion, there was no need to *protect* that particular article in that particular case. Assume Good Faith as we work out the kinks in the process. :)
--Jimbo