Delirium wrote:
Take a look at en:Talk:Harry_Reid, for example. There
was just a
message by Danny that there were "some concerns", without any comment on
to what they were, how they might be fixed, or really anything else
besides "Harry Reid doesn't like our article".
The Harry Reid article is no longer protected, and hasn't been for some
time. As has been explained repeatedly, the *length* of that protection
was an error, due to Danny being out of town and us all being new to
this sort of thing.
In my opinion, there was no need to *protect* that particular article in
that particular case. Assume Good Faith as we work out the kinks in the
process. :)
--Jimbo
--
#######################################################################
# Office: 1-727-231-0101 | Free Culture and Free Knowledge #
#
http://www.wikipedia.org | Building a free world #
#######################################################################