On 3/4/06, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/4/06, Katefan0 <katefan0wiki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
As an aside, Dzonatas has been agitating for
watering down the
[[WP:3RR]]
policy lately, so perhaps that will shed some
light on this latest
proposal.
k
I guess this is the best argument in favour of Jonathan's idea so far.
If Jonathan had been able to post anonymously you wouldn't have been
able to try and poison the discussion by bringing up his character.
Same thing applies to Wikipedia proper - contributions should be
evaluated by what they are, not by who wrote them.
Not only would Jonathan's idea not have helped in this case, but the fact
that Jonathan was blocked several times for 3RR violations, then tried to
re-write 3RR so he wouldn't be blocked in the future, and now is trying to
get Wikipedia adjusted somehow so that future 3RR violations will be
extremely difficult to track, is not "poisoining the discussion", but rather
entirely relevant.
Jay.