From: wikien-l-bounces@Wikipedia.org [mailto:wikien-l-bounces@Wikipedia.org] On Behalf Of Steve Bennett
On 3/2/06, Peter Mackay peter.mackay@bigpond.com wrote:
The article itself is rather over-egged for one about a suburban railway station, but it is heart-warming to see that the first photographs in the dawn light of a new day have been added
after a lot
of discussion about copyright usage of images found here
and there on the web.
I'm not sure what you mean about over-egged. I think it's great - there is actually a history of the railway station. This is not random trivia or excessive detail imho. Where else would you go to find that out?
Anyway, there are a huge number of articles about stations out there (the Singapore metro network is particularly well covered). Just a pity most don't have this attention to detail, number of sources etc.
That's what I mean about over-egged for an article about a suburban railway station. It would be great if '''all''' articles about such places had the same level of detail. Great if you're a nut about railway stations, I suppose. Knowing the number of parking spaces at a station is probably more than I'll ever want to know.
Peter (Skyring)