I suggest focusing on his political activities. If they are not notable, the personal details of his life are not either.
Fred
On Jun 23, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 12:17:55 +0100, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
No UK law against mention spent convictions. Otherwise tabloids would never be out of court. Foundation doesn't have any UK assets and there is not reason for any of the board memeber to enter the UK.
That is the crucial question, isn't it? Without the text of the complaint to OTRS we can't know whether the article was stated to be biased or whether it was the apparently (but without legal advice not definitely) baseless claim of protection under ROA.
If it was accuracy there is no reason not to start rebuilding from the known verifiable facts. Which, it has to be said, are mainly about the criminal conviction.
Guy (JzG)
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l