For the record, the Einstein article was only protected recently because a stubborn editor was insisting on changing the formatting to meet his own personal requirements and was revert warring. However after a week of this he finally agreed to stop after he was instructed as to how to modify his own monobook.css to make it display for him how he wanted to. It is currently unprotected.
In any case, it's a boring reason for why it was protected, and had nothing to do with its content or it being a controversial article (which except for a few anti-Einstein cranks, it has not been).
FF
On 6/17/06, Keith Old keithold@gmail.com wrote:
Folks,
The New York Times has an article on Wikipedia called " Growing Wikipedia Revises Its 'Anyone Can Edit' Policy http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/17/technology/17wiki.html?pagewanted=1&_r...
Regards
Keith Old _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l