On 6/15/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
The following was mailed to me directly by User:TJive when I asked Blnguyen to post details of the block to WP:AN
Hi, I noticed your comment on the matter of PatCheng. This is an aggressive and hostile user who has been "wikistalking" me for months to revert my contributions and post ugly, racist insults (not only to me but others). A short description of the matter can be found here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TJive/Wikistalking
More detailed information is archived here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TJive/Fenriswolf
And the matter was taken up on ANI, and has since been archived. He waited until it died down to start contesting his block:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Inciden...
Several administrators agreed with his block, and he has since repeatedly been caught using more sockpuppets:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pag...
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&type=block&pag...
TJive
Guy (JzG)
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@Wikipedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
TJive's created a sockpuppet account, [[User:YINever|YINever]], on May 30th. He immediatly tracked down and changed several articles on my watchlist, which we previously fought over, the most bitter over my removal of a personal attack on the Epoch Times talk page. [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Epoch_Times&diff=5593...].
From his insistence to restore the the "web spy" comment, to the userbox on
his user page [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:YINever&diff=prev&old...], portrayed me not as a legitimate Wikipedia editor, but somehow a "web spy employed by the Chinese government".
From my perspective, TJive's edits breaches the NPOV policy, not to mention
his reluctence to use the talk page to solve disputes. I am not the only editor having problems with TJive, as he and Blnguyen claimed. TJive used his sockpuppet YINever as well as his many IPs [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:No_Gun_Ri&diff=57318265&a...] to engage in an edit-war, which he claims as "defending his right to edit", portraying me as a "wikistalker". I have not edited as anyone else besides PatCheng, yet I was the one blocked based on YINever's hearsay. TJive has a previous history of edit wars with over users Ruy Lopez [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:TJive/Ruy_Lopez] and Comandante.
Here are some of the disputed content:
* "Castro regime" instead of "Cuban government": [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Carlos_Franqui&diff=prev&o...], [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ladies_in_White&diff=prev&... ] * Brief description content removed: [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Profits_of_Extermination&d...], [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Freedom_fighter&diff=prev&... ] * Deletion of sections; incident "alleged" despite evidence, responce only following user inquiry: [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Varela_Project&diff=prev&o...], [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=No_Gun_Ri&diff=prev&oldid=...], [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Harry_Magdoff_and_espionage&di... ] * Subject of article being a "Nazi", without corrosponding evidence: [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=George_Bernard_Shaw&diff=prev&... ] * Subject "committed suicide", not "murdered", despite my attempts to include both: [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eduardo_Chib%C3%A1s&diff=prev&... ] * Reinsertion of removed personal attacks: [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Epoch_Times&diff=5728... ] * Article vandalism: [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gay_Mafia&diff=prev&oldid=... ] * Tiananmen Square protests as "bloody supression": [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chen_Yonglin&diff=prev&old... ]
I take full responsibilty for the comments I have made talk pages, and I regret them. Such are said in anger and in no way reflect my character. However I feel these are misused by Blnguyen to used to present me as some sort of vandal and POV pusher. According to him:
''He has complained to me that he has a balanced view and wants democracy but in the diff regarding inciting hatred, he says that the only wrong thing that Mao ever did was not kill Jung Chang.''
I don't see anything done to users celebrating al-Zarqawi's death [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Abu_Musab_al-Zarqawi#DING_DONG], which someone could also argue "incite hatred against Muslims". Such statements left by me in talk pages does not, and should not reflect my editing of Wikipedia articles themselves. In at least three cases I have apologised [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PatCheng#Good_afternoon], removed my comments [ http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mao_Zedong&diff=next&...]. In other cases I was not made aware of my insults, or assumed that the have already been deleted by other users per the "soapbox" rule. Had I been made aware of the comments I made I would have no problem removing them or apologising to the persons affected.
I have already been blocked 24 hours previously for such personal attacks. I should not have been punished twice, as the current dispute is about whether Fenriswolf is my sockpuppet. As no links how been proven that I somehow process "100s of IPs", Blnguyen merely used my history of personal attacks as an excuse to block me indefinitely.