On 6/12/06, Anthony DiPierro wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
But I also don't see why it's appropriate *for Wikipedia*, unless we happen to have an article which is discussing the original, or at the very least, the event. (In the case of talking about the event there are probably better drawings which could be made, though.)
Exactly - it's being used in a generic cricket article, for which a wikipedia user photographer could go to a cricket match and photograph the event in question (assuming a bowl-out happened at that match).
-Matt