On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 16:43:02 +0200, you wrote:
The problem is basically that "referred to as cult" sounds like "everyone thinks it's a cult", but the actual criterion for inclusion is apparently "some nut once said it was". Solution: Up the stakes for inclusion to require labelling by some relatively authoritative authorities
Surely that is the standard which should already be applied, per [[WP:V]], [[WP:RS]], [[WP:NPOV]] (undue weight) and [[WP:NOR]]? That's how I would read it, anyway.
Guy (JzG)