On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 23:52:21 -0700, ScottL <scott(a)mu.org> wrote:
However, an article on a fictional work is not a
literary critique,
it has some of that in it. However in this case it is an encyclopedia
article and depending on the work may include a lot more, some of which
are facts that can (only?) be verified from the original work.
If there are no secondary sources I'd say it was unencyclopaedic
anyway. Mind you, for my money we'd have a single one-paragraph
article on the entire subject of Pokémon...
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG