On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:52:21 +0100, "Oldak Quill"
<oldakquill(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think I remember participating in a discussion about
one such
article. Those who were for the existence of the article made the
point that "criticism" doesn't necessarily imply that the commentary
is negative (although it is often used in this way). Therefore a
"Criticism of..." article should cover views both pro- and contra-.
This is fair; perhaps it should be "media discussion of foo" or some
such?
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG