On 7/23/06, Oldak Quill <oldakquill(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I think I remember participating in a discussion about
one such
article. Those who were for the existence of the article made the
point that "criticism" doesn't necessarily imply that the commentary
is negative (although it is often used in this way). Therefore a
"Criticism of..." article should cover views both pro- and contra-.
It's almost always used that way on Wikipedia. Terms like "critical
review" or "critical appreciation" are more ambiguous, but
"criticism"
is pretty unambiguously negative.
Steve