On 7/18/06, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
Absolutely. Of course that can't happen as long as the system continues to be overriden by your edict. And no, don't bring up that there was already an AfD - that AfD was on completely different content from the new article.
I would support a modification of Jimmy's "edict" to the effect that an indefinitely semi-protected article on BP would be subject to regular community processes. Indefinite semi-protection would be an expression of the belief that more harm (unsubstantiated rumors, vandalism) is likely to come from having this particular article edited by unregistered users and very new ones, than productive edits.
This, however, is an untested hypothesis. Is there any existing article or set of articles which is highly comparable to BP, where we could verify whether such a trend of inaccuracy/vandalism does indeed exist?
Erik