On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:16:45 +0200, "Steve Bennett" stevagewp@gmail.com wrote:
Totally agree with you. An article about jokes that does not have enough examples to illustrate the concept of a joke is remiss. On the other hand, an article about jokes that includes 50 examples is also in error.
I'm happy with that, as long as we can cite reliable sources for the jokes in question being widely considered representative of their type. As it is we don't even have cites for the listed types of joke being considered as such.
*an* eaxmple.
Not twenty examples, mainly added by drive-by anons who just heard this great joke. And definitely not the lets-see-who-can-find-the-most-offensive-joke cruft.
Guy (JzG)