On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 16:16:45 +0200, "Steve Bennett"
<stevagewp(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Totally agree with you. An article about jokes that
does not have
enough examples to illustrate the concept of a joke is remiss. On the
other hand, an article about jokes that includes 50 examples is also
in error.
I'm happy with that, as long as we can cite reliable sources for the
jokes in question being widely considered representative of their
type. As it is we don't even have cites for the listed types of joke
being considered as such.
*an* eaxmple.
Not twenty examples, mainly added by drive-by anons who just heard
this great joke. And definitely not the
lets-see-who-can-find-the-most-offensive-joke cruft.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG