On 7/14/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG guy.chapman@spamcop.net wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 19:40:06 -0400, Anthony wikilegal@inbox.org wrote:
The other crucial difference is that Peppers is convicted of a felony (and not a victimless felony either, but one involving force or threat of force). Unless the Ohio government seriously screwed up, Peppers is not an innocent victim.
All the indications are that this was a technical offence. It has been suggested that he touched his nurse inappropriately while trying to gain her attention. We don't know, because there is virtually no source material to work on, and that is why we should not have an article.
What indication is there, other than your unsourced "suggestion" which contradicts all the other evidence, that this was a technical offence? If Peppers accidently "touched his nurse inappropriately while trying to gain her attention", then he is not guilty of the offense, and this story is even more important.
Yes, right now we can't find any source material to definitively determine exactly what happened. The same could be said of a large number of articles. But unlike your suggestion, there is plenty of source material to create a short article on what we *do* know.
Anthony